205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.84%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.84%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
7.84%
EBIT growth similar to MRVL's 8.09%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
7.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of MRVL's 15.99%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-34.14%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-33.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.64%
Slight or no buybacks while MRVL is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.64%
Diluted share count expanding well above MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
8.00%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MRVL cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MRVL's 56.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MRVL's 109.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
7.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MRVL's 25.49%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.16%
Below 50% of MRVL's 653.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
291.16%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 220.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
291.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 202.86%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 0.04%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
8.00%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MRVL is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
8.00%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MRVL cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.