PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.21%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
21.35%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
103.17%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MRVL's 8.09%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
103.17%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
80.00%
Positive net income growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
66.67%
Positive EPS growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
66.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
30.34%
Slight or no buybacks while MRVL is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
30.34%
Diluted share count expanding well above MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-26.23%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
1562.50%
Positive OCF growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
163.89%
Positive FCF growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
44.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MRVL's 56.20%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
33.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MRVL's 109.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MRVL's 25.49%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
461.80%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MRVL's 653.69%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
43.62%
Below 50% of MRVL's 220.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-30.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MRVL is 202.86%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.48%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 0.04%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
76.37%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MRVL is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
76.37%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MRVL cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
25.69%
AR growth well above MRVL's 11.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-2.17%
Inventory is declining while MRVL stands at 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.24%
Positive asset growth while MRVL is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-21.23%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
19.09%
Debt growth far above MRVL's 3.89%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.56%
We expand SG&A while MRVL cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.