PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.66%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MRVL's 4.29%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
11.13%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
26.01%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MRVL's 8.09%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
26.01%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MRVL's 15.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
30.36%
Positive net income growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.46%
Slight or no buybacks while MRVL is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
8.46%
Diluted share count expanding well above MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-11.64%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
10.43%
Positive OCF growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
36.00%
Positive FCF growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
54.72%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to MRVL's 56.20%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
23.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MRVL's 109.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MRVL's 25.49%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1572.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 63.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
250.38%
Below 50% of MRVL's 653.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
41.03%
Below 50% of MRVL's 220.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
2034.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 202.86%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.72%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.00%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MRVL is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-7.24%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
13.12%
AR growth well above MRVL's 11.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.04%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 4.05%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.91%
Positive asset growth while MRVL is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.03%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.44%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MRVL's 3.89%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
We expand SG&A while MRVL cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.