205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.95%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 38.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.95%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 38.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-383.16%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-383.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
90.00%
Net income growth of 90.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
100.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 25.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 25.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.51%
Share change of 1.51% while MU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.51%
Diluted share change of 1.51% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
100.00%
Dividend growth of 100.00% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 222.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
8.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 222.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 222.21%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.69%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 163.69% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
163.69%
Net income/share CAGR of 163.69% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
163.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 163.69% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
19.04%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
19.04%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
19.04%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.