PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.78%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.78%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
135.97%
EBIT growth similar to MU's 132.70%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
135.97%
Operating income growth similar to MU's 132.70%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
180.83%
Net income growth of 180.83% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
200.00%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
200.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 239.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
9.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 239.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 239.48%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
665.49%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 665.49% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
665.49%
Net income/share CAGR of 665.49% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
665.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 665.49% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.