205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.84%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 6.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
7.84%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 6.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
7.84%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 6.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
7.84%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 6.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
-34.14%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-33.33%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.64%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 20.82%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 20.82%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
8.00%
Dividend growth of 8.00% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 59.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 59.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
7.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 59.98%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.16%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 291.16% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
291.16%
Net income/share CAGR of 291.16% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
291.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 291.16% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.