205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.07%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 3.08%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
2.07%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 43.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2.07%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 138.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.07%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 138.08%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
25.41%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 549.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 549.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
22.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 549.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
708.41%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 708.41% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
708.41%
Net income/share CAGR of 708.41% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
708.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 708.41% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.