PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.82%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
177.57%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
251.26%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
251.26%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-44.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-60.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-60.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
19.85%
Share change of 19.85% while MU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
19.85%
Diluted share change of 19.85% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
58.73%
Dividend growth of 58.73% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 784.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
39.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 784.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
28.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 174.41%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.25%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
179.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
24.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 24.43% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
57.92%
Below 50% of MU's 175.41%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
57.92%
Below 50% of MU's 175.41%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
32.66%
Below 50% of MU's 221.05%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-14.28%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-14.28%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-14.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.15%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-9.16%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 6.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.64%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 7.26%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-15.87%
We have a declining book value while MU shows 3.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.31%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MU's 39.02%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.37%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 6.98%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.