PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 16.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
12.33%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MU's 4.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1050.00%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1050.00%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-15.38%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 0.07%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 0.07%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.74%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
20.39%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
18.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 329.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
18.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 329.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 168.55%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-78.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 63.51% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.33%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 14.35%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
3.96%
Inventory growth well above MU's 4.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.15%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.25%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.58%
We have a declining book value while MU shows 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.84%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
SG&A growth well above MU's 8.62%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.