PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.53%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 8.52%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-4.88%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 20.12%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-115.79%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 205.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-115.79%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 205.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-163.64%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 125.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-220.00%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 354.55%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-220.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 354.55%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.25%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-4.40%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-112.40%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 0.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-101.65%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 1250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
29.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 203.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
29.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 203.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 156.59%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.23%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
92.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-111.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.31% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.82%
AR growth well above MU's 9.85%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.34%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 4.37%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.77%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.89%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.22%
We have a declining book value while MU shows 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
16.84%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.