PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.77%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 34.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.40%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 50.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
45.05%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 811.11%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
45.05%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 811.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
28.03%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 418.18%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.08%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 522.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 522.54%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-5.09%
Share reduction while MU is at 23.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.09%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 23.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-29.19%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-105.00%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 78.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
1.87%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 1750.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
44.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 340.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 340.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MU's 15.19%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-921.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-229.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
577.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 577.65% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
527.45%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 527.45% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.20%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 34.64%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-1.72%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 6.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.68%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MU's 2.72%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
15.26%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-8.56%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.90%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 35.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.