PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.31%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-58.24%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
250.00%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
250.00%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
147.06%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.23%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
148.23%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-29.30%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-29.30%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
53.23%
Dividend growth of 53.23% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-97.71%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-130.90%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
85.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1041.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
69.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 236.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
41.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
484.92%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 484.92% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-31.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 158.20% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
139.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 139.08% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.22%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 10.37%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-6.19%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 0.62%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
37.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 2.19%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.77%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.17%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 45.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.