PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.73%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 34.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.88%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 40.25%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
23.57%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 188.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
23.57%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 188.68%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
38.27%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 233.33%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
60.00%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 200.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
60.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 200.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-10.96%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-10.96%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
22.52%
Dividend growth of 22.52% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
121.15%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 95.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
219.05%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 108.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
57.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1099.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
30.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 160.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
32.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 179.29%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 291.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
747.03%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 747.03% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
18.05%
Net income/share CAGR of 18.05% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
921.88%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MU's 1280.43%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.89%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 37.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
77.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 77.23% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
64.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.10% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
0.36%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 0.36% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.67%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 143.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
3.00%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.34%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 6.73%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
18.75%
50-75% of MU's 33.35%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-1.71%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.28%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 34.05%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.