PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.66%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 21.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
11.13%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 35.37%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
26.01%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 205.88%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
26.01%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 205.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
30.36%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 227.78%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
25.00%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 166.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 166.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
8.46%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 22.92%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
8.46%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 22.92%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-11.64%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
10.43%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 65.38%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
36.00%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 31.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
54.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 676.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
23.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 102.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 155.41%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1572.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 423.47%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
250.38%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 250.38% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
41.03%
Net income/share CAGR of 41.03% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
2034.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 1538.10%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.72%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 18.17%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-7.24%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.12%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
13.04%
Inventory growth well above MU's 7.30%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.91%
Asset growth at 75-90% of MU's 6.97%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
-1.03%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.44%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.