PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.86%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 42.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 49.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3232.57%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 110.68%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
3232.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 110.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-8.90%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 113.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.50%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 112.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 112.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-18.38%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
16.37%
Diluted share change of 16.37% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-9.44%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
36.22%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 23.50%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
88.24%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 42.74%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
106.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 2464.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
57.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 118.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
53.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 190.46%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU stands at 184.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
440.05%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 440.05% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
56.48%
Net income/share CAGR of 56.48% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
370.04%
Below 50% of MU's 1995.65%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
70.39%
Below 50% of MU's 260.78%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
50.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 79.51%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
11.63%
Below 50% of MU's 32.01%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-29.09%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
31.31%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.31% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-15.96%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.13%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 171.55%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-7.95%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.04%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 15.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
23.65%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 12.55%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.95%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.65%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 23.18%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.