PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.16%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 4.61%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
7.64%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MU's 8.80%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
-97.12%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 6.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-97.12%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 6.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.75%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 7.47%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-7.69%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.80%
Share count expansion well above MU's 7.84%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-7.31%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 7.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-21.13%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
19.36%
OCF growth at 50-75% of MU's 35.68%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
62.50%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 23.50%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
77.23%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 2984.70%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 160.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
28.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 210.77%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
627.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 567.03%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
954.25%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 954.25% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
40.07%
Below 50% of MU's 88.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
314.28%
Below 50% of MU's 666.67%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.17%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 16.30%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 3.56% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-41.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
10.84%
AR growth well above MU's 13.52%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.55%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 17.67%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
7.36%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MU's 11.94%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-15.41%
We have a declining book value while MU shows 2.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.99%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.63%
SG&A growth well above MU's 9.75%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.