PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.49%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 21.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.95%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
39.71%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 28.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
39.71%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 28.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
37.31%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 28.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
33.33%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 23.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 23.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.82%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 4.41%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.55%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 4.41%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.81%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-29.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-82.21%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
65.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1819.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 195.67%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
26.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 208.51%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1140.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 521.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1129.69%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1129.69% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
52.11%
Net income/share CAGR of 52.11% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
199.89%
Below 50% of MU's 3044.50%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 26.48%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
10.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.94% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
2.72%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.72% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-88.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.11%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.86%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.78%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MU's 5.59%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
6.90%
75-90% of MU's 8.39%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-1.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.