PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.55%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 9.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.98%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 17.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.34%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 21.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.34%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 21.16%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.09%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 20.25%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 19.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 19.05%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.53%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 1.77%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.43%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 1.77%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
28.73%
Dividend growth of 28.73% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
36.43%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 73.97%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
170.27%
FCF growth 75-90% of MU's 214.38%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
75.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1244.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 204.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 205.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32045.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 636.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
282.66%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 282.66% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
115.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 208.65%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
232.45%
Below 50% of MU's 1252.16%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MU is at 68.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.50%
Below 50% of MU's 70.23%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 32.23% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-78.93%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
0.83%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 9.04%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-1.58%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 3.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 19.51%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.43%
50-75% of MU's 11.21%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-6.04%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 147.90%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 8.10%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.