PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.08%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 15.30%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
4.16%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 27.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2800.34%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 34.78%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
2800.34%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 34.78%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1.08%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 35.98%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 32.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 32.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.83%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 2.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.28%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MU's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
8.56%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 4.04%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
11.00%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 33.61%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
87.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 3494.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
34.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 306.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
46.44%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 260.20%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.37%
Below 50% of MU's 328.04%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 284.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
473.10%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 473.10% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
370.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 655.29%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
303.98%
Below 50% of MU's 1240.40%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
73.62%
Below 50% of MU's 416.53%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.94%
Below 50% of MU's 87.55%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
43.36%
Below 50% of MU's 92.36%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-25.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-13.13%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-11.62%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-1.10%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 180.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.38%
Inventory growth well above MU's 1.75%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 12.14%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.88%
Under 50% of MU's 15.45%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.