PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.88%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 8.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
27.53%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MU's 10.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-95.92%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 11.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-95.92%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 11.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
22.34%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 12.29%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
36.36%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 15.15%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 15.15%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.19%
Slight or no buybacks while MU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.28%
Slight or no buyback while MU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.19%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-45.94%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 41.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-90.99%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 30.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
103.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 4762.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
63.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 601.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 326.10%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.26%
Below 50% of MU's 733.67%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
1795.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 575.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1540.34%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1540.34% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1453.85%
Net income/share CAGR of 1453.85% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
274.20%
Below 50% of MU's 23540.84%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.10%
Below 50% of MU's 120.77%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.87%
Below 50% of MU's 117.34%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.83%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-42.43%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
15.40%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.03%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 21.36%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.18%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 18.10%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
7.50%
Under 50% of MU's 15.47%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
3.05%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MU's 15.34%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.