PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.14%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of MU's 17.48%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
13.66%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MU's 16.26%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
17.15%
EBIT growth 75-90% of MU's 19.49%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
17.15%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of MU's 19.49%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
20.87%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 15.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
20.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 13.16%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 13.16%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.82%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.95%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 1.71%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.82%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
68.24%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
830.00%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
110.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 2913.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
77.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 601.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
45.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 338.50%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.73%
Below 50% of MU's 883.79%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
147.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 588.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1724.99%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1724.99% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
2101.73%
Below 50% of MU's 19739.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
224.85%
Below 50% of MU's 10841.93%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.90%
Below 50% of MU's 152.43%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
53.12%
Below 50% of MU's 148.31%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
47.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 47.43% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-16.51%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-22.60%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
16.65%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.20%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 16.38%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
7.28%
Asset growth at 75-90% of MU's 8.31%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
7.82%
50-75% of MU's 14.38%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
0.24%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MU's 8.87%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.94%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MU's 7.04%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
17.41%
SG&A growth well above MU's 2.09%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.