PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.76%
Negative revenue growth while MU stands at 15.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.84%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 18.09%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-64.30%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 18.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-51.83%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 18.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-43.99%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 16.86%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-38.89%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 16.92%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-38.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 16.92%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 0.65%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-3.09%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-113.53%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 55.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8871.43%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 62.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
86.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 10360.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 953.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
36.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 709.11%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is at 2287.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-166.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU stands at 1791.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1100.28%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1100.28% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
350.91%
Below 50% of MU's 2620.72%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
93.82%
Below 50% of MU's 10775.27%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.91%
Below 50% of MU's 234.22%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
101.64%
Below 50% of MU's 284.21%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 6.40% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
40.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.10% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.06%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 26.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.41%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 30.03%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.01%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 25.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.26%
Under 50% of MU's 16.71%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
37.42%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.28%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 13.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.