PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.08%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 20.34%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
21.62%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MU's 40.91%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
67.84%
EBIT growth 75-90% of MU's 85.99%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
67.84%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of MU's 85.99%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
93.02%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 592.72%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
88.89%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 560.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
77.78%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 560.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.42%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 4.61%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.65%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 4.95%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
2.70%
Dividend growth of 2.70% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
107.56%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 35.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
304.55%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 112.48%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
50.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 2493.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
12.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 503.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU stands at 116.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.52%
Below 50% of MU's 673.31%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
99.32%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to MU's 108.92%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
308.53%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 308.53% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
184.44%
Below 50% of MU's 8302.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
29.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MU's 58.44%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.76%
Below 50% of MU's 371.03%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
60.15%
Below 50% of MU's 221.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
91.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.48% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.57% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
86.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.41% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
4.12%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.16%
Inventory growth well above MU's 9.08%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.34%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 9.23%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.97%
1.25-1.5x MU's 3.77%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-14.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.15%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.67%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 42.49%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.