PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.31%
Negative revenue growth while MU stands at 10.13%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.08%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 44.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
24.74%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 119.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
24.74%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 119.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
587.55%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
558.82%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
568.75%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.89%
Slight or no buybacks while MU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.76%
Slight or no buyback while MU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-3.88%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.44%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-26.97%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
41.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 2480.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
2.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 568.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-7.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU stands at 127.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.89%
Below 50% of MU's 313.79%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
31.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2355.49%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 2355.49% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
2232.04%
Below 50% of MU's 5067.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
780.74%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.09%
Below 50% of MU's 400.13%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
111.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 208.33%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
84.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 84.04% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.03% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
39.18%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MU cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-0.17%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 20.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.85%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 13.54%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
28.62%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 2.22%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
40.37%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 6.68%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-1.79%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 12.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-11.65%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.