PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.88%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.46%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-155.87%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-155.87%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-116.65%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-116.07%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-116.82%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.87%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 5.04%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.32%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 2.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
5.33%
Dividend growth of 5.33% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-13.35%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 90.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.08%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 114.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
27.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1761.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
12.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 504.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-17.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU stands at 84.11%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.67%
Below 50% of MU's 312.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
4.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-398.64%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-439.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MU is 2045.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-244.17%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
176.53%
Below 50% of MU's 2204.63%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
178.97%
Below 50% of MU's 387.27%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
85.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 162.83%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
93.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.86% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
30.11%
Dividend/share CAGR of 30.11% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
40.58%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MU cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-3.45%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 24.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-2.11%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 20.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-10.15%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 16.77%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.23%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-16.54%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 125.27%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
169.45%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 18.44%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
16.62%
SG&A growth well above MU's 7.92%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.