PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
13.22%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 252.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
597.37%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 16.96%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
634.21%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 16.96%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
215.38%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
233.33%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
233.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.46%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.22%
Dividend growth of 3.22% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
82.20%
OCF growth at 75-90% of MU's 97.95%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
146.94%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 28.24%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
9.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 404.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-11.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MU stands at 148.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-40.47%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
6.52%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
43.07%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 43.07% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-45.24%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.33%
Below 50% of MU's 327.84%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
51.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 75.33%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
93.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.58% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
33.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 33.51% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
2.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.52% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.07%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 12.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-19.26%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.61%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.34%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.15%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.90%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-31.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.