PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.14%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.09%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 82.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
128.36%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 36.57%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
128.36%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 36.57%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
119.86%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 46.14%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
119.44%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 46.39%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
119.44%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 46.39%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.54%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.23%
Dividend growth of 0.23% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-73.66%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 16.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-87.40%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 49.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 235.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-6.45%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
64.62%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 152.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
506.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-52.39%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
26.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
892.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-72.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
363.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 645.10%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
67.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 11.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-6.45%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 22.06%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
46.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.91% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
4.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.65% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
3.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.23% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.16%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.65%
Inventory growth well above MU's 5.24%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-20.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.97%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 13.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.51%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 9.28%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.