PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.29%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
17.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 131.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
99.20%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 69.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
99.20%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 69.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
269.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 65.29%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
271.43%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 65.69%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
257.14%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 65.69%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.54%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
3.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.54%
Dividend growth of 0.54% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.92%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 83.59%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
28.24%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 58.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-3.87%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU stands at 106.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
8.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-19.76%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
64.67%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-17.74%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is at 2600.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
4.61%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
151.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
147.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-34.10%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
308.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 442.74%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
72.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 26.86%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-8.05%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
31.93%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.93% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.18%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
5.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 5.82% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.69%
AR growth well above MU's 2.67%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-0.50%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 17.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.09%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.01%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.68%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.38%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-4.57%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.