PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 12.69%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 56.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
10.98%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 1645.07%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
10.98%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 1645.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
27.66%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 421.20%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
32.00%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 418.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 395.45%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.93%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.28%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 9.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.79%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
86.17%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 11.34%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
308.00%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 71.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
32.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 6.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 26.33%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
102.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 4.93%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
72.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 14.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
172.49%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 19.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
158.75%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
36.06%
Below 50% of MU's 371.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
564.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 126.85%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
285.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with MU's 297.66%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
58.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 16.04%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
7.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
39.88%
Stable or rising dividend while MU is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
5.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.99% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
1.81%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 8.30%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
5.53%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 19.51%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.54%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 1.49%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.72%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 1.77%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-51.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-6.03%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.93%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 15.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.