PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.98%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MU's 3.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.85%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
55.96%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
34.61%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
52.80%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
58.33%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
58.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-4.00%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.80%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.68%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
58.13%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 5.83%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
131.71%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 95.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
-8.26%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU stands at 36.87%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
19.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
74.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 87.91%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
93.48%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 15.05%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
35.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 63.33%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
148.63%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 452.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
107.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-49.18%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
669.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 459.90%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
195.47%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with MU's 178.48%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-5.11%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MU is at 4.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
17.24%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
63.48%
Stable or rising dividend while MU is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
26.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 26.48% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
9.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 9.16% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.15%
AR growth well above MU's 8.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.45%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 6.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.72%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.31%
Under 50% of MU's 2.07%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.22%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 10.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.40%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 2.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.45%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.