Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Share reduction while MU is at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 8.17%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.

Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.

Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 27.02%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 75.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 137.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Inventory is declining while MU stands at 9.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.

Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.09%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 8.53%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.