PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.45%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-33.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-87.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-93.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-80.99%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-79.07%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-79.07%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.76%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.28%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
9.57%
Dividend growth of 9.57% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
6.27%
OCF growth at 50-75% of MU's 11.98%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
21.75%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
121.43%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
81.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 10.59%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-13.17%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
367.14%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
111.98%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
54.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
0.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-57.80%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-79.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
153.14%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 7.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
59.03%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-2.17%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
656.97%
Dividend/share CAGR of 656.97% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
692.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 692.36% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
267.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 267.82% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-48.53%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-12.70%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.36%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.95%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-7.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.