PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.34%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 17.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 58.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
14.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 80.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
14.68%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 80.08%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
21.75%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 69.66%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.26%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 72.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.81%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 72.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.04%
Share reduction while MU is at 3.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.63%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 3.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
9.10%
Dividend growth of 9.10% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
20.02%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 136.42%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-7.07%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 254.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
54.53%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
32.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
42.74%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
6.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
40.02%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
99.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
85.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
15.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
45.75%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
3.31%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1.15%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
508.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 508.03% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
370.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 370.06% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
203.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 203.64% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 6.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.71%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.81%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.09%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.80%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
2.35%
SG&A growth well above MU's 2.50%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.