PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.66%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 33.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 160.59%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.23%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 510.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.57%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 510.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.46%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 331.82%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.11%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 18.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.73%
Dividend growth of 0.73% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-29.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
53.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
48.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 5.39%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 3.07%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
133.79%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
87.28%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
49.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
106.89%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
120.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 0.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
49.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of MU's 60.77%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
15.89%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
13.63%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1.63%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
463.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 463.52% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
378.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 378.03% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
200.44%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 200.44% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.50%
AR growth well above MU's 36.72%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.16%
Inventory growth well above MU's 5.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.07%
Asset growth at 75-90% of MU's 2.37%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
1.59%
Under 50% of MU's 6.41%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.16%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 18.29%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.