PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.95%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MU's 0.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
1.45%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.90%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.79%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.82%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.94%
Share reduction while MU is at 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.17%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.03%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
22.29%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 10.52%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
10.25%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
163.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 27.27%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
25.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MU's 23.35%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
17.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 29.82%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
66.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1559.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
32.66%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
38.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 124.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
628.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 149.00% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-62.18%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
30.50%
Below 50% of MU's 107.24%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
33.35%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
14.54%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
528.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 528.07% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
328.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 328.75% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.76% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.63%
AR growth well above MU's 2.28%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.01%
Inventory growth well above MU's 3.44%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
28.46%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.09%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.79%
SG&A growth well above MU's 4.29%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.