PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.23%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.51%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 9.89%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-13.11%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 32.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.06%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 32.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-8.77%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-8.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.04%
Share reduction while MU is at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.95%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.30%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
80.35%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
166.20%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 12.94%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
173.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 56.04%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
21.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 15.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
16.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 10.47%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
397.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 76.51%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
257.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 8.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
23.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 109.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
850.50%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 114.29% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
12.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
21.68%
Below 50% of MU's 124.59%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
39.50%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
20.69%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 2.03%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
484.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 484.42% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
323.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 323.55% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
28.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.78% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.70%
AR growth well above MU's 7.32%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.52%
Inventory growth well above MU's 5.67%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
22.28%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 1.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.19%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
65.84%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-6.84%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 13.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.60%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.