PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.62%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 13.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.26%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 68.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
51.57%
EBIT growth 50-75% of MU's 85.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
129.37%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 85.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.32%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
84.37%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
81.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.36%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.53%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
33.67%
Dividend growth of 33.67% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
87.22%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
109.06%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 53.03%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
104.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 58.20%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
8.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 16.25%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-4.55%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
179.43%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 446.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
55.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
31.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
754.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 72.40% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
34.33%
Below 50% of MU's 72.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-6.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
58.52%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
32.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 7.68%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
1208.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1208.79% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
180.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 180.15% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
130.21%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 130.21% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.85%
AR growth well above MU's 7.64%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.18%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.54%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.43%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.11%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 6.29%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-7.16%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
2.61%
SG&A growth well above MU's 3.36%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.