PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.35%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.67%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
19.59%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
19.65%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
20.94%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 10.26%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
22.22%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 10.14%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
22.58%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 11.48%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.03%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.10%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.21%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
78.45%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 4.68%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
84.17%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 9.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
75.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 115.27%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
43.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 174.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 74.28%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 241.41%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
96.33%
Below 50% of MU's 634.47%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
31.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 131.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
139.45%
Below 50% of MU's 435.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
81.78%
Below 50% of MU's 311.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
48.33%
Below 50% of MU's 906.08%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
32.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 8.93%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
31.35%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 61.31%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
2.49%
Below 50% of MU's 8.42%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1346.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1346.20% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
173.68%
Dividend/share CAGR of 173.68% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
132.62%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.62% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.27%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
0.40%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 2.84%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.51%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.09%
BV/share growth of 1.09% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-0.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.87%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.91%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.