PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.28%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.83%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.58%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.89%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
18.19%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.46%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
24.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.10%
Diluted share change of 0.10% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.22%
Dividend growth of 0.22% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
32.18%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
39.85%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
46.99%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 52.84%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
21.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 32.19%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
24.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MU's 25.04%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
407.30%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
41.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
34.40%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
107.43%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
84.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
68.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
28.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 19.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
6.60%
Below 50% of MU's 38.54%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.90%
Below 50% of MU's 66.34%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1149.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1149.23% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
194.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 194.94% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.78% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.34%
AR growth well above MU's 4.49%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.62%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 11.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.33%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 8.79%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.48%
BV/share growth of 3.48% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-0.03%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 25.76%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.52%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.64%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.