PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.55%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 17.08%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
10.73%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 68.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
18.30%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 190.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
18.21%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 190.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
5.92%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 396.67%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.06%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 376.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.19%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 381.25%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.40%
Share reduction while MU is at 5.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.39%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 6.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.00%
Dividend growth of 0.00% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
15.35%
OCF growth at 50-75% of MU's 23.46%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
14.67%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 254.67%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
55.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 127.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
27.00%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 101.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 9.16%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
47.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 242.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
55.81%
Below 50% of MU's 118.89%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
27.49%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
150.27%
Below 50% of MU's 1302.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
171.55%
Below 50% of MU's 456.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
66.59%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 17.96%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
34.68%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 21.14%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
10.06%
Below 50% of MU's 58.83%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.24%
Below 50% of MU's 48.43%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
526.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 526.04% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
192.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 192.90% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.12% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.87%
AR growth well above MU's 17.86%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.64%
Inventory growth well above MU's 9.09%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.88%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 16.23%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.05%
BV/share growth of 1.05% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
6.70%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MU's 28.70%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
2.44%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 0.64%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-1.14%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 17.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.