PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.38%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 19.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.44%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 89.57%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.49%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 171.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.16%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 171.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 187.73%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
0.96%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 187.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.98%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 186.79%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.47%
OCF growth at 75-90% of MU's 16.45%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
11.93%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 3235.90%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
66.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 209.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
37.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 133.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
14.40%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
164.44%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 438.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
86.38%
Below 50% of MU's 735.82%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
21.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
301.53%
Below 50% of MU's 1961.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
118.16%
Below 50% of MU's 837.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
30.19%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
36.59%
Below 50% of MU's 338.73%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
28.13%
Below 50% of MU's 216.69%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
21.31%
Below 50% of MU's 52.51%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
688.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 688.88% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.47%
Dividend/share CAGR of 167.47% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
64.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.28% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.90%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 26.19%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
0.38%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
12.96%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 3.34%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.95%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 3.83%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
23.80%
Debt growth far above MU's 1.11%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-0.77%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 4.52%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-3.06%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 7.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.