PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.07%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 11.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.28%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 25.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.28%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 64.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.59%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 64.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.81%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 56.77%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
9.48%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 56.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.66%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 57.24%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.62%
Dividend growth of 12.62% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2.92%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 9.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-44.64%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 43.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
73.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 241.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
52.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 129.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
34.08%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 1.18%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
198.43%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 869.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
83.17%
Below 50% of MU's 286.16%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.33%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
782.06%
Below 50% of MU's 1880.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
120.11%
Below 50% of MU's 1525.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
77.97%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
49.67%
Below 50% of MU's 358.28%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
37.23%
Below 50% of MU's 223.98%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
52.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 40.40%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
576.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 576.51% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.41% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
48.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.82% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.90%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 25.53%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.52%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.03%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 5.19%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
9.61%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 3.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
6.03%
Debt growth far above MU's 0.72%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.26%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MU's 5.22%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.94%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.