PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 1.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-3.26%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 44.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.40%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 32.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.06%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 32.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 18.62%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.53%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 18.78%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.07%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 18.78%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.09%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MU cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
38.46%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1040.43%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 17.45%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
68.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 51.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
13.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
19.91%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.13%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-1.85%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
35.56%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
227.96%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
16.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
27.56%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
81.65%
Below 50% of MU's 479.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
68.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with MU's 67.90%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
101.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 21.92%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
341.28%
Dividend/share CAGR of 341.28% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.61%
Dividend/share CAGR of 99.61% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
37.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.84% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
1.02%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 6.63%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.80%
Inventory growth well above MU's 1.34%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.26%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.34%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MU's 7.48%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-1.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.