PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.04%
Negative revenue growth while MU stands at 6.88%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-13.64%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 34.88%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.51%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 6.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.97%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 6.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-19.78%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 24.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.21%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 24.28%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 24.28%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.88%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MU cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-0.67%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 937.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
75.57%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 21.15%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
61.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 33.09%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
15.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
1.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
91.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-5.86%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-8.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
220.89%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
16.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-17.80%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
87.00%
Below 50% of MU's 355.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
97.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 44.60%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 14.79%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
333.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 333.29% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 68.41% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
27.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.57% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-9.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 0.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.33%
Inventory growth well above MU's 1.81%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.24%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.60%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
5.05%
Debt growth far above MU's 0.61%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-2.34%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-3.10%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.