PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.20%
Negative revenue growth while MU stands at 17.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-13.82%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 91.95%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-14.40%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 23.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.11%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 23.37%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-19.40%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 13.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.33%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 14.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 14.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 0.46%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 0.46%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.05%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-47.14%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 462.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-129.77%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 67.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
45.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 11.18%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
5.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-13.52%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
161.49%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-5.20%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-44.30%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
169.54%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-6.31%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-36.13%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
89.97%
Below 50% of MU's 342.34%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
105.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 30.42%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
69.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 8.93%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
332.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.40% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 68.60% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
27.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.51% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-6.49%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 20.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.10%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.84%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.29%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.36%
Debt growth far above MU's 1.24%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
3.91%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MU's 17.52%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 20.09%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.