205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.27%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.27%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-368.46%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-368.46%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.71%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.11%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.11%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 79.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
31.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 77.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
31.19%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
317.31%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to NXPI's 328.95%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
317.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
13.09%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
13.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 18.89%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
13.09%
Below 50% of NXPI's 42.98%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-46.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while NXPI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-46.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 169.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-46.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while NXPI invests at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.