205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.31%
Negative revenue growth while NXPI stands at 3.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-58.24%
Negative gross profit growth while NXPI is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
250.00%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
250.00%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
147.06%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.23%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
148.23%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-29.30%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-29.30%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
53.23%
Dividend growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-97.71%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 37.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-130.90%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
85.05%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to NXPI's 79.10%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
69.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 77.31%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
41.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
484.92%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-31.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is 328.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.20%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to NXPI's 169.49%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
139.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 20.43%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
0.22%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NXPI's 1.04%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.84%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-6.19%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
37.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.20%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.77%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.17%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.