PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.18%
Negative revenue growth while NXPI stands at 3.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-54.96%
Negative gross profit growth while NXPI is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
23.89%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
23.89%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
5.19%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.97%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.97%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-10.10%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-70.45%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 37.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-120.49%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
36.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 79.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
10.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 77.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.27%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
616.08%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-18.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is 328.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
456.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 42.98%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.94%
Below 50% of NXPI's 169.49%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-18.09%
Negative near-term dividend growth while NXPI invests at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.28%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.50%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
7.75%
Asset growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.80%
50-75% of NXPI's 3.20%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-2.91%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.