205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.86%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
0.99%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
3232.57%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3232.57%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-8.90%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-18.38%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
16.37%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-9.44%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
36.22%
Similar OCF growth to NXPI's 37.88%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
88.24%
FCF growth similar to NXPI's 94.26%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
106.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 79.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
57.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 77.31%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
53.45%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
440.05%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
56.48%
Below 50% of NXPI's 328.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
370.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
70.39%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
50.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
11.63%
Below 50% of NXPI's 42.98%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-29.09%
Cut dividends over 10 years while NXPI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
31.31%
Below 50% of NXPI's 169.49%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-15.96%
Negative near-term dividend growth while NXPI invests at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.13%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-7.95%
Inventory is declining while NXPI stands at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.04%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
23.65%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.20%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.95%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.65%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.