205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.20%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-6.44%
Negative gross profit growth while NXPI is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.41%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.41%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.69%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-5.26%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-5.26%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.57%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.27%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
2.54%
Dividend growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
4.31%
OCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 37.88%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-94.07%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
137.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 79.10%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
76.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to NXPI's 77.31%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
71.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.01%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is at 107.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
42.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
665.18%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
548.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 328.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
257.19%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
128.96%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
49.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
98.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 42.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
4.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.56% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
23.92%
Below 50% of NXPI's 169.49%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
29.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 20.43%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
-5.71%
Firm’s AR is declining while NXPI shows 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.77%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.61%
Asset growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.79%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.20%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.21%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while NXPI invests at 4.75%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
40.00%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.